Individual differences in personality predict the use and perceived effectiveness of essential oils. Something’s going on here: psychological predictors of belief in conspiracy theories. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Postdigital Science and Education 2020 2:9-13.Ħ. Lies, bullshit and fake news: some epistemological concerns. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2015 144:674-687.ĥ. Searching for explanations: how the internet inflates estimates of internal knowledge. On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Barr N, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2018 76:249-258.ģ. 14 Behaviorally, higher bullshit receptivity has been associated with lower engagement in “prosocial” acts like donating to or volunteering for charity. 12-14 However, bullshit receptivity is by no means a trait exclusive to conservatives-evidence from Sweden indicates correlation with Green Party affiliation. ![]() 3,9-11 Studies exploring associations between bullshit receptivity and political ideology have found positive correlations with certain aspects of political conservatism including support of conservative social policies, as well as favorable views of Senators Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio and President Trump. 3,6-10 It’s inversely correlated with intelligence and analytical thinking. Across various research studies, bullshit receptivity has been associated with paranormal and pseudoscientific beliefs, belief in conspiracy theories, the tendency to perceive connections between unrelated things, and the tendency to perceive false or fake news as accurate as well as a willingness to share it on social media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |